If the Unthinkable Happened: Nuclear Weapons and the War in Ukraine
As the war in Ukraine grinds into its third year, occasional rhetoric from the Kremlin has once again raised the spectre of nuclear weapons. While analysts remain divided over whether Moscow would truly breach the post-1945 nuclear taboo, the possibility—however remote—merits consideration. Not in the spirit of alarmism, but of preparedness.
This article outlines what might happen if a nuclear weapon were used in the conflict, with a particular focus on so-called tactical nuclear weapons: devices designed for battlefield use rather than city-level destruction. It also provides a measured assessment of likely consequences—military, political, and humanitarian—and offers practical advice for civilians who might find themselves in the proximity of such an attack.
Nuclear war remains an outcome most actors continue to avoid at almost any cost. But for the first time in decades, the global public is being forced to reacquaint itself with the language and logic of deterrence, escalation, and fallout. Knowledge, as always, is a better companion than fear.
1. What Kind of Nuclear Weapon Might Be Used?
The nuclear arsenal is not monolithic. It ranges from massive intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) designed to annihilate entire cities, to smaller tactical weapons intended for battlefield use. If Russia were to use a nuclear weapon in Ukraine, experts agree it would almost certainly be the latter—though even these “limited” devices are immensely destructive.
Tactical Nuclear Weapons
Tactical (or “non-strategic”) nuclear weapons typically have yields ranging from 0.1 to 50 kilotons. For comparison:
The bomb dropped on Hiroshima: ~15 kt
Modern battlefield options (e.g., Russia’s Iskander missile system): 5–20 kt range
U.S. B61 bomb (variable yield): can be set from 0.3 to 50 kt
These weapons are designed to achieve localized military objectives: destroying a fortified position, halting an advancing force, or signaling escalation without inviting full-scale retaliation.
Delivery systems include:
Short-range ballistic missiles (e.g., Iskander-M)
Tactical cruise missiles (e.g., Kalibr)
Nuclear artillery shells
Air-dropped bombs from fighter-bombers or strike aircraft
While called “tactical,” the destructive radius and downstream consequences (including radiation) are anything but minor.
Strategic Nuclear Weapons
Strategic weapons are the warheads typically associated with intercontinental conflict. They range from 100 kilotons to several megatons, delivered via ICBMs, submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), or long-range bombers.
A strategic strike on a major city—Kyiv, Warsaw, or Berlin—would signify the collapse of deterrence doctrine. Such an act would almost certainly result in retaliatory destruction of Russian command centers and risk global escalation. For this reason, their use in the Ukrainian theatre is considered extremely unlikely.
2. What Would Happen Immediately?
The physical and psychological consequences of even a single tactical nuclear detonation would be immediate, far-reaching, and history-shifting.
Blast and Thermal Effects
The blast wave from a 10–20 kt detonation would:
Flatten buildings within 500–1,000 meters
Cause third-degree burns up to 1.5–2 km from ground zero
Generate overpressures capable of collapsing lungs and shattering internal organs
Eject debris at supersonic speeds, injuring anyone within line of sight
The thermal radiation would ignite fires across a wide radius—urban centers could experience secondary firestorms, especially in dry or windy conditions.
Radiation Exposure
Prompt radiation includes gamma rays and neutrons emitted at the moment of detonation—lethal doses can be delivered within a 1 km radius.
Fallout, however, is the greater concern for populations beyond the immediate blast. Ground-burst weapons vaporize soil and infrastructure, mixing it with radioactive isotopes and lofting it into the upper atmosphere. Depending on wind direction, radioactive fallout could:
Contaminate farmland and water supplies
Cause acute radiation sickness dozens of kilometers downwind
Render entire regions uninhabitable for years
Fallout patterns are unpredictable but can travel hundreds of kilometers under certain conditions—modeling from the U.S. Cold War era suggests that even small warheads can affect zones far outside the intended strike area.
Medical System Collapse
Ukraine’s healthcare infrastructure—already under wartime strain—would likely be overwhelmed. Radiation treatment, burn care, and trauma surgery all require specialized facilities and staff. A nuclear strike could quickly saturate available capacity and force difficult triage decisions.
3. How Might the World Respond?
A nuclear detonation would not remain a localized military event. It would be a geopolitical earthquake.
Military Response (NATO and Allies)
While NATO nuclear doctrine allows for retaliatory strikes, the alliance’s more likely response would be overwhelming but conventional:
Targeted air and missile strikes against Russian military assets
Accelerated delivery of advanced weapons systems to Ukraine
Possible cyber operations to degrade Russian command and control
Some analysts argue NATO could consider declaring limited no-fly zones or launching strikes on key airbases in Russia or Crimea—an escalation, but short of nuclear war.
The United States has privately and publicly warned that any Russian nuclear use would result in “catastrophic consequences,” carefully worded to keep options open.
Diplomatic and Economic Fallout
Even Russia’s more neutral partners—China, India, Brazil, Turkey—would be forced to reassess their ties. Open support for a state that used nuclear weapons on a neighbor would be diplomatically radioactive.
New sanctions would be swift and brutal. Russia’s last remaining avenues for global trade—energy sales, raw materials, grain exports—could be aggressively targeted. Russian access to global shipping, airspace, and financial systems would shrink further.
Global Nuclear Norms Erode
Perhaps most dangerously, a Russian nuclear strike would shatter the post-1945 nuclear taboo. Other nuclear-armed states (North Korea, Pakistan, potentially Iran) could cite the precedent to justify future actions. The global nonproliferation regime—already under pressure—would suffer a potentially irreversible blow.
4. Practical Advice for Civilians
While nuclear conflict is not imminent, preparing mentally and logistically for such contingencies can reduce panic and help individuals make safer choices under stress. Below is a simplified framework based on civil defense principles, updated for modern urban settings.
A. During the First Minutes
If you see a flash or hear a detonation, immediately seek shelter. Do not look toward the blast.
Go to the lowest level of your building (basement if possible), or an interior room away from windows.
Avoid elevators and glass walls—shockwaves and firestorms may follow.
B. Fallout Awareness
If the detonation was at ground level, fallout may begin falling within 15–30 minutes, especially downwind.
Radioactive fallout looks like dusty ash or sand. Do not go outside.
Stay sheltered for at least 24 hours, or until official guidance is received.
C. Improvised Protection
Use concrete, earth, or water as shielding. Walls and dense materials significantly reduce radiation exposure.
In the absence of a fallout shelter:
Stack furniture or books around the walls of your shelter room
Hang blankets or tarps across doorways to create insulation
Use duct tape and plastic to seal vents or gaps in windows
D. Personal Decontamination
If outside during the event, remove outer clothing immediately (they may contain 80–90% of radioactive material).
Wash with soap and water. Avoid conditioner and lotions, which can trap particles.
Bag contaminated clothes in plastic and store them outside if possible.
E. Information and Coordination
Battery-powered radios are more reliable than cell service in a disrupted grid.
Avoid unverified social media or rumor-based actions—false information can be as dangerous as fallout.
Follow civil defense alerts and guidance from emergency services when available.
5. A Measured Conclusion
It is unlikely—but not implausible—that a nuclear weapon will be used in Ukraine. Russia’s leadership is aware of the enormous strategic, diplomatic, and existential risks involved. But in a war that has defied predictions, prudent awareness remains preferable to passive hope.
If the nuclear threshold is crossed, the effects will ripple far beyond the Donbas. The world would be entering a new phase of strategic instability, one in which deterrence must be rebuilt, doctrines reassessed, and civil preparedness reconsidered.
For ordinary people—whether in Europe, Russia, or anywhere else—there is little value in panic. But there is real utility in calm, informed readiness. Understanding how to survive the initial moments, reduce exposure, and make rational decisions under stress can save lives.
Preparedness is not paranoia. It is resilience. And in an age that seems increasingly unpredictable, resilience is the most human of virtues.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY 4.0
Feel free to share, adapt, and build upon it — just credit appropriately.
